Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 8, 2023
Published
Jun 29, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 66 Download : 63

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study described Immanuel Kant’s critique of the ontological argument, which he considered weak and flawed in proving the existence of God. Kant had been criticized by many philosophers -the philosophers who defended the ontological argument- as soon as he put forward the critique of the ontological argument. Immanuel Kant argued against the analyticity of "exists" and its status as a real predicate. He criticized ontological arguments, highlighting the distinction between logical and ontological necessity. Kant rejected attempts to derive the existence of a supreme being from concepts, stating that existence transcended conceptual boundaries. While sensory objects could be known through our senses, the existence of pure reason or thought remained unknowable without a priori knowledge. Our awareness of existence pertained to the unity of experience, and any existence beyond it was an unjustifiable illusion. In this study, someone would not disclose the critique of Kant’s critique of ontological argument.

Keywords

Immanuel Kant Ontological Argument Analytical-Synthetic Preposition Real Predicate

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Dina, D., & Himam, M. M. (2023). Immanuel Kant’s Critique of the Ontological Argument: Challenging the Existence of God. AN NUR: Jurnal Studi Islam, 15(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37252/annur.v15i1.421
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Acar, Rahim (2017). Akil ve inanç Din Felsefesine Giris. istanbul: Küre Yayinlari.
  2. Agca, Fatma Nur (2014), Kantin Ontolojik Argüman? Ele?tirisi, Thesis, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi
  3. Copleston, FreAcar, Rahim (2017). Ak?l ve ?nanç Din Felsefesine Giri?. ?stanbul: Küre Yay?nlar?.
  4. Adams, Robert Merrihew (1971). The Logical Structure of Anselm's Arguments. Philosophical Review 80 (1):28-54
  5. A?ca, Fatma Nur (2014), Kant’?n Ontolojik Argüman? Ele?tirisi, Thesis, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi
  6. Borges, M. D. L. (1998, January). Hegel And Kant On The Ontological Argument. In The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy (Vol. 11, pp. 29-32)
  7. Copleston, Frederick translated by Aziz Yard?ml? (2004). Kant, Istanbul: ?dea Yay?nevi
  8. Descartes, Rene. Translated by Ömer özden (1996). ?bn Sina-Descartes Metafizi?i (Metafizik Dü?ünceler). ?stanbul: Dergah Yay?nlar?.
  9. Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Pocket Guide to Social Work Re. p. 22
  10. Erdem, Engin (2016). Varl?ktan Tanr?’ya: ?bn Sina’n?n Metafizik Delili. ?stanbul: Endulus Yay?nlar?.
  11. Günenç, Mehmet (2009), Kant’?n Tanr? Anlay???. Dissertation, Istanbul: ?stanbul Üniversitesi
  12. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments/
  13. Hick, John & Mcgill, Arthur C. (1969). The Many-Faced Argument. Recent Studies on the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God. Religious Studies 5.
  14. Johnstone, B. (2017). Discourse analysis. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Kant, Immanuel. translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  16. Kant, ?mmanuel. Translated by Aziz Yard?ml? (2012). Ar? Usu Ele?tirisi, Istanbul: Idea Yay?nevi.
  17. Kwan, K. M. (2009). The Argument From Religious Experience. The Blackwell Companion To Natural Theology, 498-552.
  18. Malcolm, N. (1960). Anselm's Ontological Arguments. The Philosophical Review, 69(1), 41-62.
  19. Malcolm, N. Anselm's Ontological Arguments. 41-62
  20. Ömer Mahir Alper, Y. M. F. (2002). ?slam Felsefe Gelene?inde Ontolojik Kan?t: Farabî Örne?i . Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology
  21. Pailin, D. A. (1968). Some Comments on Hartshorne's Presentation of the Ontological Argument. Religious Studies, 4(1), 103-122.
  22. Rahim Acar et al., (2013). Din Felsefesi Seçme Metinler, ?stanbul: Küre Yay?nlar?
  23. Recep K?l?ç, Mehmet Sait Reçber (2016). Din Felsefesi El Kitab?. Ankara: Garfiker Yay?nlar?
  24. derick translated by Aziz Yard?ml? (2004). Kant, Istanbul: ?dea Yay?nevi
  25. Descartes, Rene. Translated by Ömer özden (1996). ?bn Sina-Descartes Metafiziii (Metafizik Dü?ünceler). Istanbul: Dergah Yayinlari.
  26. Erdem, Engin (2016). Varl?ktan Tanri’ya: ?bn Sina’n?n Metafizik Delili. ?stanbul: Endulus Yay?nlar?.
  27. Günenç, Mehmet (2009), Kant’in Tanri Anlay???. Dissertation, Istanbul: Istanbul Üniversitesi
  28. Hick, John & Mcgill, Arthur C. (1969). The Many-Faced Argument. Recent Studies on the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God. Religious Studies 5
  29. Kant, Immanuel. Translated by Aziz Yardiml? (2012). Ar? Usu Ele?tirisi, Istanbul: Idea Yayinevi.
  30. Kant, Immanuel. translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  31. Ömer Mahir Alper, Y. M. F. (2002). Islam Felsefe Gelene?inde Ontolojik Kan't: Farabî Örneii . Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology
  32. Rahim Acar et al., (2013). Din Felsefesi Seçme Metinler, ?stanbul: Küre Yayinlari
  33. Recep Kiliç, Mehmet Sait Reçber (2016). Din Felsefesi El Kitab?. Ankara: Garfiker Yayinlari